My Blog Story My Blog Story

Can You Really Make a Living Trading Futures? An Honest Look with Real Math and Real Life

Leave a Comment

If you search online whether it’s possible to make a living trading futures, you’ll find two extremes.

On one side, there are people flashing payouts, posting screenshots, and saying futures trading gave them “financial freedom.” On the other side, there are people saying trading is a scam and no one makes money except brokers.

The truth sits quietly in the middle — and it’s rarely explained properly.

So instead of hype or fear, let’s slow down and talk honestly.

Can You Really Make a Living Trading Futures? An Honest Look with Real Math and Real Life



Not like a YouTube video trying to impress you. But like one trader talking to another, explaining what this path really looks like.

The real question isn’t “Can someone make money trading futures?”
The real question is: Can an average, disciplined person realistically replaces a normal income by trading futures, month after month, without blowing up mentally or financially?


What “Making a Living” Actually Means 




When people say “making a living,” they often imagine luxury. But in real life, making a living usually means something much simpler.

It means your bills are paid. Rent or mortgage is covered. Food, insurance, family expenses, and basic savings are handled. There is some peace of mind.

For many people in the US, that number sits around $4,000 to $6,000 per month after losses, not before. Let’s take the middle and call it $5,000 per month.

That equals $60,000 per year.

This number is important because it grounds everything. Without a clear number, trading becomes emotional. With a clear number, trading becomes math.


Why Futures Trading Attracts So Many People

Futures trading attracts people because it looks efficient. You don’t need millions of dollars. You don’t need to hold positions for years. You can trade indices like NQ or ES with leverage, clear rules, and defined risk.

Prop firms made this even more attractive. Suddenly, people could trade large notional size without risking personal capital. On paper, it looks like the perfect shortcut.

But efficiency cuts both ways. Futures trading amplifies discipline — and it amplifies mistakes even faster.


Let’s Do the Math Slowly (No Motivation, No Fantasy)

Let’s assume you trade NQ (Nasdaq futures), because that’s what many retail traders are drawn to. One NQ point equals $20 per contract.

Now forget social media trades. Forget 100-point runners. Forget perfect entries.

Let’s talk about average performance, because average performance is what pays rent.

If you want to make $5,000 per month, and you trade about 20 days a month, you need to average $250 per trading day.

That’s it.

Not every day. Not green every session. Just an average across the month.

Some days you might make $600. Some days you might lose $200. Some days you make nothing because you didn’t trade.

But the average must hold.

This is where many people suddenly feel uncomfortable. Because $250 per day doesn’t sound exciting — but achieving it consistently is far harder than chasing one big win.


Why This Simple Math Is Harder Than It Looks

On paper, $250 per day could be one decent NQ trade. In reality, the difficulty is not technical — it’s psychological.

Most traders don’t fail because they don’t understand charts. They fail because their mind refuses to accept slow, boring consistency.

After a loss, the brain wants to “fix” the day. After missing a move, the brain wants revenge. After one good trade, confidence spikes and discipline drops.

Futures trading exposes every emotional weakness you have. And prop firm rules make this exposure even sharper.


The Role of Prop Firms: Help or Hidden Pressure?

Prop firms are not scams, but they are not charity either. They are businesses built around trader behavior.

They give you buying power, but they also impose rules like trailing drawdowns, daily loss limits, and consistency requirements. These rules exist because most traders would destroy themselves without them.

For disciplined traders, prop firms can be a powerful tool. They limit catastrophic losses and allow scaling without risking personal savings.

For emotional traders, prop firms feel like psychological torture. The trailing drawdown moves, pressure builds, and one bad emotional decision can end weeks of progress.

Can You Really Make a Living Trading Futures? An Honest Look with Real Math and Real Life


Prop firms don’t reward intelligence. They reward emotional control.


Why Most Traders Never Reach Consistent Income

Here is the uncomfortable truth. Most traders don’t fail because they lose money. They fail because they can’t stop trading.

They trade when the market is quiet. They trade when setups are unclear. They trade because they feel bored, angry, or impatient.

Losses hurt less than overtrading damage. Overtrading drains confidence, focus, and discipline. Once that happens, even good setups are executed poorly.

Professional traders are not obsessed with making money. They are obsessed with protecting clarity.


What Actually Works in Real Life

Can You Really Make a Living Trading Futures? An Honest Look with Real Math and Real Life


People who survive futures trading long enough to make a living tend to do a few boring things very well.

They trade the same instrument every day, usually in the same session. They accept small green days without trying to turn them into jackpots. They stop trading early when conditions are bad instead of forcing action.

Most importantly, they think in monthly terms, not daily emotions.

A losing day is not a failure. A reckless day is.


Can Futures Trading Replace a Full-Time Job?

Yes, it can — but not quickly, and not safely without years of emotional conditioning.

Many traders who eventually succeed go through a long phase where trading income is supplemental, not primary. They build skill, discipline, and trust in their process before relying on it.

Anyone trying to replace a full-time income too fast usually increases size too early, breaks rules under pressure, and blows accounts — funded or personal.

Futures trading rewards patience in a way few careers do.


The Part No One Likes to Admit

Trading for a living is lonely. There is no guaranteed paycheck. There is no boss telling you when you’re doing well. There is no applause for discipline.

Some months will be quiet. Some months will test you emotionally. And the market does not care about your bills.

But for people who respect risk, accept slow growth, and treat trading like a profession instead of entertainment, it is possible.

Not glamorous. Not viral. But real.


Final Thoughts

Making a living trading futures is not about predicting the market. It’s about managing yourself.

If you can control risk, limit trades, accept boredom, and think in averages instead of emotions, the math works.

If you chase excitement, validation, or fast money, the market will eventually take everything back.

The market doesn’t punish you for being wrong.
It punishes you for being undisciplined.


Read More...

MyFundedFutures vs Tradeify Daily Payouts (50K Account) — An Honest Comparison for Normal Traders (Not Gurus)

Leave a Comment


Before we start, one important thing to be very clear about:

👉 MyBlogStory.com has ZERO affiliate links with any prop firm.
👉 We do NOT get paid if you choose MyFundedFutures, Tradeify, or any other firm.
👉 This article exists only to help normal traders avoid repeating costly mistakes.

Most prop firm blogs are written to sell you an account.
This one is written to help you survive one.


The uncomfortable truth about prop firms (that nobody hides anymore)

Almost every prop firm openly admits this in their statistics:

Around 97% of traders fail funded or evaluation accounts repeatedly.
Only ~3% ever achieve consistent payouts.

That is not a conspiracy — it’s the business model.

Prop firms make money from:

  • resets

  • failed evaluations

  • emotional overtrading

  • traders choosing plans that don’t match their skill level

This article will NOT turn you into the top 3%.

👉 This article is about understanding reality, so you can plan smarter.

If you are already a highly disciplined, consistently profitable trader —
you probably don’t need this article.

If you’re a normal trader trying to improve your odds, keep reading.


What this article compares (no distractions)

We are comparing ONLY:

  • MyFundedFutures – Scale Rapid (50K account)

  • Tradeify – Select Plan with Daily Payouts (50K account)

Why only 50K?
Because:

  • MFF daily payout setup is available only on 50K

  • 50K is the most common entry size for retail traders

  • This is where most traders lose money repeatedly


Both are subscription-based (monthly cost reality)

Let’s clear one myth first.

❌ There is no “one-time cheap prop firm anymore.”

Reality:

  • MyFundedFutures (50K) → Monthly subscription

  • Tradeify (50K) → Monthly subscription

You pay every month until you pass, fail, or quit.

So the real question is NOT:

“Which is cheaper today?”

The real question is:

“Which gives me a better chance to not fail again?”


Evaluation difficulty: this already separates traders

Profit targets & minimum days

FirmProfit TargetMinimum Trading Days
MyFundedFutures (50K)$3,0002 days
Tradeify (50K)$2,5003 days

On paper, MFF looks faster.

But in reality:

  • 2-day pass encourages oversized risk

  • 3-day pass enforces patience

Most traders fail because they rush.

A slightly longer evaluation is not a disadvantage —
it’s a filter against gambling behavior.


Funded stage: where 90% of traders blow accounts

This is the part most YouTube videos skip.

MyFundedFutures Scale Rapid (50K)

Key rules:

  • Profit split: 80% trader / 20% firm

  • Daily payouts: Yes

  • Intraday trailing drawdown: YES

  • No daily loss limit

Now the critical hidden rule 👇

MFF Live Account Transition Rule (very important)

Once your cumulative simulated profits reach $10,000
(profits + payouts combined):

  • Your account is reviewed

  • You are transitioned to a live account

  • Only up to $5,000 is transferred

  • Any remaining profits are forfeited

Example:

  • You make $6,000

  • Withdraw $2,000

  • Make another $4,000
    → Cumulative = $10,000
    → Live transition
    Maximum usable profit = $5,000

This means:

  • Even though MFF advertises “no payout cap”

  • There is a practical ceiling on 50K Rapid accounts

This is not wrong, but it must be understood.


Tradeify Select with Daily Payouts (50K)

Key rules:

  • Profit split: 90% trader / 10% firm

  • Daily payouts: Yes

  • No intraday trailing drawdown

  • End-of-day drawdown only

  • Daily loss limit exists (this matters)

  • Daily payout cap: $1,000

  • After 5 payouts, eligible for live account

Yes, Tradeify limits daily payouts.

But:

  • No profit forfeiture

  • No cumulative profit trap

  • No sudden reset of excess gains

Growth is slower, but cleaner.


The biggest difference that kills traders: drawdown type

Intraday trailing drawdown (MFF)

This is where most traders fail.

  • Drawdown moves with unrealized profit

  • Normal pullbacks can violate rules

  • Forces micromanagement

  • Encourages emotional exits

This model is extremely hard for normal traders.


End-of-day drawdown + daily loss limit (Tradeify)

This model:

  • Lets trades breathe

  • Stops revenge trading

  • Prevents one bad day from turning into a blown account

  • Fits realistic retail trader psychology

This is not “easy” —
it’s less destructive.


Which plan benefits most traders?

Tradeify Select (50K) is better for ~97% of traders

Why?

  • Higher profit split (90%)

  • No intraday trailing drawdown

  • Daily loss limit protects capital

  • Slower progression = fewer emotional mistakes

  • Cleaner path to live account

If you are a normal trader, Tradeify gives you better odds of survival.


MyFundedFutures Scale Rapid (50K) is for experts only

MFF makes sense only if:

  • You already manage risk perfectly

  • You are comfortable with intraday trailing drawdown

  • You treat 50K as a steppingstone to Pro

  • You don’t care about the effective $5K transition ceiling

For most traders, this setup is too aggressive.


Final honest conclusion (no hype)

All prop firms are designed to:

  • reduce payouts

  • increase failures

  • profit from repetition

That will never change.

But between these two 50K setups:

👉 Tradeify removes more failure traps
👉 Tradeify aligns better with human behavior
👉 Tradeify offers higher probability, not higher fantasy

This article is not about becoming the top 3%.

It’s about stopping unnecessary losses
and choosing a plan that fits who you actually are
not who Twitter makes you think you are.


Disclaimer

This article is for educational purposes only.
No financial advice. No affiliate relationships.
Prop firm rules change frequently. Futures trading involves substantial risk, and most traders lose money.

Always verify current rules directly on the official prop firm website.

Read More...

Hidden Gem Stocks to Watch in December 2025

Leave a Comment

Long-Term & Swing Ideas I’ve Been Watching While Everyone Else Looks Away

By December, markets usually quiet down.

Tax-loss selling peaks.
Retail attention fades.
Social-media noise drops.

That’s typically when I slow down and observe, not rush to act.

I’m not trying to predict bottoms or chase quick wins. I use year-end periods to study underfollowed companies and understand why they’re being ignored — and whether that neglect is justified or emotional.

This article is not a list of stock recommendations.
It’s a look into how I personally think about long-term and swing opportunities when expectations are low and narratives reset.


How I Approach “Ignored” Stocks

I don’t look for excitement. I look for disconnects.

Things like:

  • Real businesses with traction but no hype
  • Cyclical fear scaring away short-term traders
  • Sectors that fell out of favor even though demand didn’t disappear

Most ideas don’t work out. That’s normal.
The goal isn’t to be right often — it’s to be selective and patient.

Below are three examples I’ve been researching recently, mainly to understand process, not to promote any outcome.


1) Aehr Test Systems (AEHR)

Sector: Semiconductor Equipment (Silicon Carbide / EV infrastructure)

What initially caught my attention here wasn’t the stock — it was what the company actually does.

Aehr builds testing systems for silicon carbide chips, which are used heavily in:

  • Electric vehicles
  • Power electronics
  • Energy-efficiency systems

Silicon carbide adoption isn’t a trend — it’s a structural shift. But companies supporting that shift often get ignored because they don’t fit popular narratives.

Why it’s often overlooked

  • Revenue cycles scare short-term traders
  • No flashy AI story
  • Small-cap volatility keeps institutions cautious

That doesn’t make it “good” or “bad” — just misunderstood.

When I look at companies like this, I’m not asking “how fast can this go up?”
I’m asking “does this business still matter two or three years from now?”


2) Gatos Silver (GATO)

Sector: Precious Metals (Silver)

Silver rarely gets attention unless prices explode. Most investors either focus on gold or ignore metals entirely.

What interests me about silver is its dual role:

  • An industrial input (solar, EVs, electronics)
  • A monetary hedge during uncertain periods

Gatos is a producer, not a speculative explorer. That distinction matters more than most people realize.

Why it stays under the radar

  • Mining stocks aren’t trendy
  • Cost structures confuse retail investors
  • Metals don’t generate viral narratives

I don’t treat mining stocks as “conviction plays.”
I treat them as cyclical exposure — something that works only under specific conditions.

If those conditions never arrive, that’s fine. Capital preservation comes first.


3) Origin Materials (ORGN)

Sector: Sustainable / Alternative Materials

This is a very different type of idea.

Origin Materials is building alternatives to petroleum-based plastics using biomass and wood residues. It’s early-stage, execution-dependent, and risky — there’s no pretending otherwise.

What makes it interesting (to me) is not ESG hype — that phase already died.
It’s the reality that sustainability compliance isn’t optional for many industries, even when investor interest collapses.

Why this kind of stock gets punished

  • Execution timelines slip
  • Funding risk exists
  • Market patience disappears quickly

I don’t view companies like this as investments in certainty.
They’re optional exposure, sized small, understood clearly, and accepted as high-risk.


How I Personally Think About Ideas Like These

I don’t go all-in on stocks like this.
I don’t build narratives around them.

My general approach:

  • Core capital stays in stable, boring assets
  • Smaller “satellite” positions explore asymmetric ideas
  • If something fails, it fails quietly without damaging the portfolio

Most ideas don’t work. That’s part of the process.
Survival matters more than being early or clever.


A Grounded Perspective

“Hidden” ideas don’t feel comfortable.
They don’t trend.
They don’t come with cheering crowds.

That’s not a guarantee of success — but it’s usually where learning happens.

December, for me, isn’t about action.
It’s about preparation, observation, and understanding how narratives change.

Nothing more.


Disclaimer

This article is shared for educational and informational purposes only.
It reflects personal research and opinion, not financial or investment advice.

I am not a registered financial advisor. Stock market investments involve risk, including the loss of capital. Readers should conduct their own research and consult a qualified professional before making any financial decisions.

MyBlogStory.com does not accept responsibility for actions taken based on this content.

Read More...

Why 90% of Traders Blow Funded Accounts Immediately - The Truth Behind Funded Trading Failure

Leave a Comment




Funded trading looks like the perfect shortcut to a trading career. You pass a challenge, unlock a $50,000 trading account, and dream of huge payouts.
But reality hits hard:

90% of traders blow their funded account almost immediately.

After trading multiple prop firm accounts myself — especially the common $50K account with a $2,000 max drawdown and $1,200 daily limit — I learned EXACTLY why traders fail.

This breakdown is brutally honest, backed by real funded traders, and designed to help you stay funded longer.

1. A $50K Funded Account Is Actually a $2,000 Risk Account

Prop firms advertise the “$50,000 account”, but they don’t highlight the truth:

Max Total Drawdown = $2,000

This is the ONLY real capital you’re allowed to lose.

That means:

  • You’re NOT trading $50,000.

  • You’re trading a $2,000 risk bubble with strict boundaries.

  • Every decision must be based on protecting that bubble.

Why traders blow accounts:

They size trades based on $50K, not $2K.

Just a few losses push them into:

  • Daily drawdown violation

  • Total drawdown breach

  • Instant account termination

The correct mindset:

Treat the account like a $2,000 live account with hard rules, not a $50K flex.

2. Daily Drawdown ($1,200) Is the Silent Account Killer

Most prop firms enforce a daily loss limit of around $1,200 for a $50K account.

Failing traders think:

“I’ll stop if I hit -$1,200.”

Professional traders think:

“I stop at -$300 to -$500. Period.”

Why?

Because once you approach -$900…
You’re already emotionally damaged.
Tilt begins.
One extra mistake → daily DD violation → account gone.

The professional rule:

Stop trading long before the official limit.

This one shift saves more funded accounts than anything else.

3. Challenge Mentality Carries Over Into Funded Stage

To pass challenges, traders:

  • Overtrade

  • Use oversized risk

  • Trade news

  • Try to finish fast

Then they go into the funded account with the SAME aggression.

Bad idea.

Challenge Mode = Aggressive

Funded Mode = Defensive

If you don’t switch your trading personality the day you get funded, the account won’t last more than a few sessions.

4. Misunderstanding Trailing Drawdown vs Static Drawdown

Trailing drawdown is a trap for new traders.

Example for a $50K account:

  • Max trailing DD = $2,000

  • You grow account from $50,000 → $51,500

  • New DD cutoff = $49,500

Now even a normal losing day can violate drawdown.

Why traders fail:

They think they’re safe because balance is up.
But trailing drawdown uses equity, not balance.

One spike down → violation.

5. Emotional Tilt After a Small Loss Spiral

This is the main reason traders destroy funded accounts.

Loss → frustration → revenge trade → bigger loss → panic → rule break → account gone.

A funded account requires:

  • Calmness

  • Waiting

  • Stopping early

  • Protecting psychology

A bad emotional decision can cost you the entire $2K drawdown in minutes.

Best rule:

2 losses = stop trading for the day.

6. No Real Edge or Data Behind Their Strategy

Most traders cannot answer:

  • What’s your win rate?

  • What’s your average R?

  • What is your max expected losing streak?

  • Which session is your system strongest?

  • Does your system fail in chop?

  • What’s your maximum favorable run?

Without these, you’re gambling — and gambling does not survive prop firm risk limits.

Funded traders who last:

  • Know their stats

  • Have a repeatable edge

  • Avoid untested setups

  • Trade only during high-probability windows

7. Traders Don’t Treat Funded Accounts Like a Business

They treat it like a gamble:

  • “Let me flip this into a payout fast.”

  • “I need to make back yesterday’s loss.”

  • “I need one big day.”

Professionals treat funded accounts like:

  • A slow, secure income stream

  • A business with controlled expenses

  • A system where capital preservation = priority

A funded account is a job, not a jackpot.

The sooner you accept that, the longer your account lives.

The Survival Blueprint for a $50K Funded Account

Account: $50,000

Real risk capital: $2,000

Daily drawdown limit: $1,200

Here’s the model the 10% of successful funded traders use:

1. Risk Per Trade: $50–$150

Small, boring, consistent.

2. Personal Daily Loss Limit: $300–$500

Lower than the firm’s limit by design.

3. Max Trades Per Day: 2–4

Overtrading kills more accounts than strategy errors.

4. Rules After Two Losses

Stop trading.
Walk away.
Do NOT fight the market.

5. Switch to “Preservation Mode” After Getting Funded

You passed the challenge — great.

Now reduce your risk.

Your job now is:

  • Preserve capital

  • Protect the account

  • Reach the first payout

  • Stabilize your trading

Final Truth: Staying Funded Is a Skill Most Traders Never Learn

Anyone can pass a challenge during a good market week.

But staying funded requires:

  • Patience

  • Emotional control

  • Consistent small wins

  • Respecting risk limits

  • Understanding drawdown mechanics

  • Treating the account like a business

The 90% who fail trade emotionally and aggressively.
The 10% who succeed trade small, slow, and controlled.

If you want to stay funded long term, shift from trader to risk manager.

That’s the difference.

FAQ — Common Questions Traders Ask 

Why do most traders fail funded accounts?

Because they treat the account size ($50K) instead of the real risk capital ($2K), ignore drawdown rules, and let emotions take over.

How much should I risk per trade on a $50K funded account?

Between $50–$150 depending on volatility and confidence.

Is it realistic to make money with prop firms?

Yes — if you trade conservatively, avoid tilt, and protect the $2K drawdown buffer.

How can I avoid blowing my funded account?

Stop at -$300 to -$500 per day, risk small, avoid news, take only A+ setups, and never trade emotionally.

What’s the biggest mistake traders make with prop accounts?

Carrying their “challenge aggression” into the funded stage.

Read More...

Best Futures Prop Firms for Scalpers in 2025

Leave a Comment
Best Futures Prop Firms for Scalpers 2025 – Micro Commission Comparison

🏆 Best Futures Prop Firms for Scalpers in 2025: Don’t Let Commissions Kill Your Profits





If you’re a futures trader who scalps micro contracts (MES, MNQ, M2K, MYM, etc.), commissions can quietly eat away your edge. Most traders think accounts blow up because of bad trades, but in reality, fees are often the silent killer. This guide compares the cheapest prop firms for scalpers in 2025, explains how fees really work, and gives a clear verdict so you keep more of your profits.

🚨 Why Commissions Matter So Much for Scalpers

Commissions and fees are charged per contract, per side — meaning you pay every time you enter and every time you exit a trade, multiplied by however many contracts you’re trading.

Example (MES, 1 contract, round-trip):
Commission: $0.50  •  Exchange: $0.37  •  Clearing: $0.19  •  NFA: $0.02
Total = $1.08 per side, or $2.16 round-trip

Scale that up and costs explode fast:

  • 10 contracts = $21.60 per trade
  • 20 trades/day = $432/day
  • One month ≈ $8,000+ in fees

Bottom line: the wrong prop firm destroys scalpers. Choose for true all-in cost, not just the advertised “commission-only”.

📚 What “All-In (AI)” vs “Commission-Only (CO)” Means

  • CO (Commission-Only): Broker/firm commission only. You still add Exchange + Clearing + NFA to get the real cost.
  • AI (All-In): Commission + Exchange + Clearing + NFA included. This is your true trading cost.

📊 Prop Firm Commission Comparison (Micros & Minis — 2025)

Prop Firm Micros (RT) Minis (RT) Type Notes
Apex Trader Funding $1.04 AI ~$3.10 All-In Cheapest published all-in rate (Tradovate).
Take Profit Trader (TPT) ~$1.30–$1.40 AI ~$5.00 CO → AI $0.50 RT commission-only; after fees lands near $1.30–$1.40.
FundingTicks $1.34 AI ~$2.84 All-In Transparent all-in via Tradovate table.
Lucid Trading ~$1.80–$2.00 AI ~$5.50+ CO → AI $1.00 RT commission-only; all-in ends above TPT after fees.
TradeDay $1.62 AI ~$4.76 All-In Mid-tier pricing.
MyFundedFutures $1.74 AI ~$4.68 All-In Slightly pricier than TradeDay.
Tradeify $1.82 AI ~$5.76 All-In Higher cost; not ideal for heavy scalpers.
FundedNext $1.30–$1.96 AI (plan-based) $4.36–$5.76 All-In Depends on NinjaTrader plan: Lifetime cheaper, Free most expensive.
TickTickTrader ~$1.80–$2.00 AI ~$5.00 CO → AI $1.20 RT commission-only; all-in rises notably after fees.

RT = Round-Trip = entry + exit. AI = All-In (includes exchange/clearing/NFA). CO = Commission-Only (add fees).

🧮 Scalper Cost Calculator — Monthly Impact

Assumptions: 1 contract per trade (round-trip), 20 trading days/month. Costs shown for 10, 50, and 100 trades/day.

Prop Firm Cost/RT (Micros) 10 Trades/Day 50 Trades/Day 100 Trades/Day
Apex Trader Funding $1.04 AI $208 $1,040 $2,080
Take Profit Trader (TPT) ~$1.35 AI $270 $1,350 $2,700
FundingTicks $1.34 AI $268 $1,340 $2,680
Lucid Trading ~$1.90 AI $380 $1,900 $3,800
TradeDay $1.62 AI $324 $1,620 $3,240
MyFundedFutures $1.74 AI $348 $1,740 $3,480
Tradeify $1.82 AI $364 $1,820 $3,640
FundedNext (Lifetime) $1.30 AI $260 $1,300 $2,600
FundedNext (Monthly) $1.70 AI $340 $1,700 $3,400
FundedNext (Free) $1.96 AI $392 $1,960 $3,920
TickTickTrader ~$1.90 AI $380 $1,900 $3,800

🥇 Best Prop Firms for Scalpers (2025 Verdict)

1) Apex Trader Funding — Top Pick

  • $1.04 RT all-in on micros (Tradovate).
  • Lowest true cost for high-frequency scalpers.
  • Multi-account scaling (up to 20 accounts) + frequent 50%–90% evaluation discounts.

2) Take Profit Trader (TPT) — Simple & Cheap

  • Commission-only: $0.50 RT on micros. After fees ≈ $1.30–$1.40 AI.
  • Flat, consistent pricing across evaluation and funded accounts.

3) FundingTicks — Transparent Flat Pricing

  • $1.34 all-in on micros.
  • Publishes the full Tradovate commission schedule for easy budgeting.

❌ Firms Scalpers Should Be Careful With

  • Lucid Trading — All-in around $1.90 RT. Too costly for heavy scalpers.
  • FundedNext — Only attractive with Lifetime plan (~$1.30 RT). Monthly/Free plans are expensive.
  • TradeDay / MyFundedFutures / Tradeify$1.62–$1.82 RT on micros; okay for swing trading, not scalping 20–100 trades/day.
  • TickTickTrader — True all-in near $1.90 RT despite low commission-only ad rate.

✅ Final Takeaway

If you scalp micros at high frequency, commissions can make or break profitability.

  • Best overall: Apex Trader Funding — lowest all-in cost + scaling.
  • Strong runner-up: Take Profit Trader (TPT) — simple $0.50 commission-only, ~1.35 AI.
  • Solid middle ground: FundingTicks — transparent $1.34 AI.

Bottom line: In 2025, Apex and TPT are the clear winners for micro scalpers.

ℹ️ Disclaimer & Contact

This article is based on my online research of official commission tables as of 2025. Commission rates and policies can change — always confirm with the prop firm or your platform (Tradovate, NinjaTrader, etc.) before trading.

Read More...

The Hidden Truth About Prop Firms Live Streamers, and Why Most Traders Keep Losing

Leave a Comment



In today’s prop trading boom, thousands of traders tune in to live streamers each day. They watch the flashy wins, copy the trades, and dream about payouts. Yet, when the dust settles, most viewers blow their accounts… while the streamer keeps making money.

Why? Let’s break it down.


1. Streamers Don’t Rely on Trading Alone

The reality is simple: affiliate and referral codes pay the bills.

Every time you buy a new account or reset through their links, they get a commission.
That means your account is their product.

Now think like a business owner:

  • If you sell a product, do you want customers buying less, or more?

  • You want more — and the only way that happens in prop trading is if people keep blowing accounts.

So, whether intentionally or subconsciously, streamers benefit the most when viewers lose.


2. Why Do Streamers “Mess Up” Trades?

Ever noticed streamers making reckless or “silly” trades that don’t add up?

It’s not always bad luck. Many times, it’s part of the cycle:

  • They take flashy trades for entertainment.

  • Followers copy, accounts blow, resets are purchased.

  • Affiliates and prop firms make money — everyone but the trader watching.

And have you asked yourself this:
👉 If thousands of people are following the same trades, why do only the streamers end up profitable long-term?


3. The Prop Firm Partnership Game

Prop firms know the game too.

  • They give free resets or discounts to top streamers.

  • They promote live channels and “expert trading shows.”

  • They allow copying live trades, but ban bots or account sharing.

Why? Because streamers are marketing machines.
Their job isn’t to help you succeed — it’s to keep you trading, failing, and buying more accounts.


4. The Illusion of “Helping Traders”

If prop firms really wanted every trader to win, the industry would collapse overnight.

Think about it:

  • If 30–40% of traders consistently hit payouts, the business model is dead.

  • Prop firms rely on the majority failing to keep profits flowing.

  • Live TV channels, daily trade streams, and multiple strategies are not education… they’re distractions.

More noise, more confusion, more resets.


5. The Real Takeaway

If you’ve been sucked into live streams, believing someone else’s trades will save you, step back.

⚠️ The truth is simple:

  • Streamers win when you lose.

  • Prop firms thrive when you keep resetting.

  • Live trading channels are designed to mislead, not help.

The only way forward is to learn to trade yourself.
Use other traders for motivation, not signals. Build your own system, your own rules, your own discipline.

By the end of the day, your success won’t come from copying a streamer — it will come from trusting yourself.


✍️ If I kept going, I could write a full book on the tactics prop firms use to keep traders in the loop of hope and loss. But for now, remember this one thing:

👉 Trade yourself. Believe in your edge. Don’t be the product.

Read More...

AI-Quantum Fusion: The Game-Changing Futures Trading Strategy for 2025 That Predicts Black Swan Events Before They Hit

Leave a Comment


In the chaotic world of futures trading, where volatility reigns supreme and black swan events—like sudden geopolitical flares or climate disasters—can wipe out portfolios overnight, traders are desperately seeking an edge. But what if I told you there's a revolutionary strategy blending artificial intelligence (AI) with quantum computing principles that's set to dominate 2025? This isn't your grandpa's trend-following or scalping tactic; it's AI-Quantum Fusion, a hyper-advanced approach that simulates infinite market scenarios to forecast disruptions in commodities, indices, and crypto futures with eerie accuracy. And guess what? No one's talking about it yet—until now. Buckle up as we dive into this untapped powerhouse that's poised to mint millionaires while Wall Street scrambles to catch up.

As we hit mid-2025, futures markets are exploding with trends like micro contracts for retail accessibility and altcoin perpetuals amid crypto's resurgence. But traditional strategies? They're outdated in an era of AI-driven insights and quantum-inspired simulations. This post uncovers the AI-Quantum Fusion strategy, why it's the hottest futures trading innovation for 2025, and how you can implement it to outsmart black swans. If you're into futures trading strategies 2025, best futures to trade, or how to trade futures profitably, this could be your viral ticket to consistent wins.

What is AI-Quantum Fusion in Futures Trading?

Imagine AI algorithms not just analyzing historical data but quantum-leaping into probabilistic futures—modeling thousands of "what-if" scenarios in seconds. AI-Quantum Fusion marries machine learning's pattern recognition with quantum computing's ability to process superposition (multiple states at once), allowing traders to predict rare, high-impact events in futures markets.

Unlike standard AI-powered trading (which relies on classical computing and often misses outliers), this hybrid uses quantum annealing techniques—think D-Wave systems or IBM's Quantum Experience—to optimize risk models. In 2025, with quantum tech becoming more accessible via cloud platforms, futures traders can now simulate black swans like oil supply shocks or soybean crop failures tied to climate anomalies.

Why is this new? While AI in futures is trending (e.g., sentiment analysis from news), fusing it with quantum for black swan prediction is groundbreaking. No mainstream strategy guide mentions it—yet it's substantiated by emerging research from firms like JPMorgan experimenting with quantum for derivatives pricing. This isn't hype; it's the next evolution, especially for volatile 2025 markets influenced by tariffs, AI booms, and green energy shifts.

Why AI-Quantum Fusion Will Dominate Futures Trading in 2025

Futures trading 2025 is all about navigating uncertainty: From crude oil volatility amid OPEC+ drama to gold's safe-haven surge against inflation. Traditional strategies like trend following or breakout trading work in stable times, but black swans—those 1% probability events—crush them. AI-Quantum Fusion flips the script by:

  1. Hyper-Accurate Volatility Forecasting: Quantum algorithms crunch entangled variables (e.g., weather data + geopolitical tweets) to predict spikes in VIX futures or natural gas contracts, outperforming classical models by up to 30% in backtests.
  2. Black Swan Hedging: Simulate "impossible" scenarios, like a sudden EV battery shortage impacting copper futures, and auto-adjust positions. This is crucial for 2025's commodity bull run driven by infrastructure spending.
  3. Real-Time Adaptation: Integrate with platforms like NinjaTrader or TradeStation, using AI to quantum-optimize entries/exits in micro futures for low-risk retail plays.
  4. Crypto Futures Edge: In altcoin perpetuals (e.g., Solana or Ripple micros), fusion strategies detect meme-driven pumps before they viralize on X, blending sentiment AI with quantum probability.

Politically incorrect truth: Wall Street elites already use proto-versions of this via proprietary quantum access, leaving retail traders in the dust. But in 2025, democratization via open-source tools like Qiskit levels the field—substantiated by CME Group's push for quantum-secure trading tech.

Step-by-Step: How to Implement AI-Quantum Fusion in Your Futures Trading

Ready to go viral with your trading results? Here's a beginner-friendly guide to this futures trading strategy 2025:

  1. Choose Your Platform: Start with brokers like Interactive Brokers or tastytrade, which support API integrations for AI tools. Add quantum simulators via IBM Quantum or Google Cirq—free for basics.
  2. Build Your Model: Use Python libraries like TensorFlow for AI and Qiskit for quantum. Code a simple script to analyze futures data (e.g., from Yahoo Finance API) and run quantum optimizations for risk scenarios.
  3. Target Hot Contracts: Focus on trending 2025 futures:
    • Crude Oil (WTI): Quantum-predict tariff impacts.
    • Gold: Hedge against Fed uncertainties.
    • Micro E-minis: Low-entry for indices like S&P 500.
    • Crypto: Bitcoin/Altcoin perpetuals for leverage plays.
  4. Risk Management: Set 2% max risk per trade, use stop-losses quantum-tuned for volatility. Backtest against 2024 black swans like election volatility.
  5. Monitor and Scale: Track via dashboards; join communities on Reddit's r/FuturesTrading for tweaks.

Table of Top Futures for AI-Quantum Fusion in 2025:

Contract Why It's Hot Fusion Edge Potential ROI (Est.)
Crude Oil (/CL) Geopolitical tensions, tariffs Predicts supply shocks via quantum scenarios 20-50% on swings
Gold (/GC) Inflation hedge Simulates rate cut black swans 15-30% safe plays
Micro E-mini S&P (/MES) Market breadth AI detects index divergences quantum-fast 25-40% scalps
Bitcoin Futures (/BTC) Crypto volatility Meme/altcoin integration for perpetuals 50-100% leveraged
Natural Gas (/NG) Climate events Weather-quantum models for anomalies 30-60% seasonal

This strategy isn't foolproof—leverage amplifies losses—but substantiated tests show it outperforms standard AI by handling uncertainties better.

Risks and the Bold Reality of 2025 Futures Trading

Bold claim: Ignoring AI-Quantum Fusion could cost you big in 2025's divergence economy, where managed futures thrive amid uncertainty. Risks include high computational costs (quantum access isn't cheap yet) and over-reliance on models during true unknowns. But with regulations evolving for digital assets, this fusion positions you ahead.

Final Thoughts: Make 2025 Your Breakout Year

AI-Quantum Fusion isn't just a strategy—it's the future of futures trading, turning black swans into profit opportunities. If this post blew your mind, share it now and tag a trader friend; let's make it go viral! For more game-changers, check my deep dive on prop firms for futures or ICT strategies fused with AI. Subscribe for weekly tips—your next millionaire move starts here. What's your take? Drop a comment below! 🚀

Read More...